Founders often blame investors for silence
Published
Apr 18, 2025
Topic
Founders Journey
Post Written by Vasily Alekseenko
Subscribe to Rare Founders' for a weekly newsletter of handpicked startup events for founders and investors in London 📩 = https://rarefounders-newsletter.beehiiv.com/
Let’s face it — every founder thinks they’re special. We kind of have to. A little bit of delusion is a survival mechanism in this game. Otherwise, we’d all give up before the first rejection email.
But there’s a difference between being ambitious and being careless. And way too many founders go full “spray and pray” with their outreach — which not only doesn’t work, but ends up doing more harm than good.
I’ve invested in a few startups myself, and running Rare Founders means I’m constantly speaking to other angels, VCs, syndicate leads, and accelerator partners. The feedback is always the same. Founders keep making the same mistakes — and they’re turning potential allies into very annoyed people.
So if you want to avoid becoming that founder, read this 👇
🔴 Don’t add investors to your update list without asking.
I’m not the only one who gets this — every investor I know is spammed daily with random “investor updates” from founders they’ve never spoken to. Guess what we do with those emails? Mark as spam. Every time.
Not only does that annoy investors, but it damages your email deliverability — so even the right people will stop seeing your updates. Just ask. If someone wants to hear from you, great. If not, save yourself the hassle.
🔴 Stop sending cold messages without checking relevance.
Most investors clearly state their criteria — on LinkedIn, websites, even Twitter/X bios. But founders still ignore it and send pitch messages that have nothing to do with what that investor actually backs.
I’ve had this happen, and so has every investor I know. If you can’t be bothered to read a LinkedIn profile or Google a thesis, don’t expect a reply. Straight to spam or ignore.
🔴 Don’t pitch 2 seconds after connecting on LinkedIn.
Again — this isn’t just me. Ask any investor and they’ll tell you: nothing screams “I don’t respect your time” more than an instant cold pitch right after the connection is accepted.
What works? Personalised messages. Something like: “I saw your comment on X,” or “I’ve been to your event — it really helped me,” or “I loved your blog on Y.” These always stand out. The rest? Delete.
🔴 No reply after 3 messages = move on.
This applies to all outreach — email, LinkedIn, whatever. Most investors are overwhelmed with messages and pitches. If someone hasn’t replied after a couple of follow-ups, take the hint. It’s not personal. Move on and try again in 6-12 months if it makes sense.
🔴 Read the damn investment criteria.
This is probably the most common complaint from every VC, accelerator, and pitching competition I’ve spoken to. Founders apply without checking if they’re even a fit.
All the info is public — stage, sector, cheque size, region. But too many founders just assume “maybe they’ll like us anyway.” No. They won’t. You’ll just come across as sloppy and unprepared.
🔴 Don’t send generic messages. Ever.
Mail merge and automation tools are tempting — but it’s obvious when you’re using them. Every investor I know can spot a generic message a mile away. If you’re not putting in the effort to personalise, don’t expect effort in return.
Use tools like ShipShape.vc if you need help — but at the very least, read someone’s damn LinkedIn before hitting send.
🔴 Don’t lie about investor commitments.
Some founders think that dropping a few “soft commits” or name-dropping random investors will magically build momentum. It won’t — especially if it’s not true.
This isn’t Dragon’s Den. Investors talk. And when someone says “we’ve got 50% already committed” and it turns out to be their uncle’s mate who said he’s “thinking about it” — your credibility’s gone. Not just with that investor, but with their whole network.
A little FOMO can help, but fake FOMO kills trust. And once that’s gone, it’s game over.
This stuff isn’t just about “best practice.” It’s basic respect for people’s time and attention. You’re not just hurting your own chances — you’re making it harder for every other founder who does take the time to do it properly.
So be the founder who stands out — in a good way.